Demographics details for Hazel park, MI vs Silt, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hazel park, MI vs Silt, CO.
| Data | Hazel park | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,838 | 3,594 |
| Median Age | 37.2 years | 31.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,576 | $72,450 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Hazel park vs Silt
- In Hazel park, the population is higher at 14,838, compared to 3,594 in Silt.
- Residents in Hazel park have a higher median age of 37.2 years compared to 31.0 years in Silt.
- Silt has a higher median income of $72,450, compared to $59,576 in Hazel park.
- In Silt, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 30.0% in Hazel park.
- Hazel park has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Silt.
- Silt has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.1% in Hazel park.
Demographics
Demographics Hazel park vs Silt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hazel park | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 72 | 43 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 39 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hazel park vs Silt
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hazel park at 10% compared to 1% in Silt.
- Hazel park has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 43% in Silt.
- The Asian population is larger in Hazel park at 2% compared to 0% in Silt.
- Silt has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 6% in Hazel park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Silt at 17%, compared to 10% in Hazel park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hazel park and Silt at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hazel park | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | 35.9% | 25.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hazel park vs Silt
- More residents in Hazel park report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in Silt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hazel park at 24.2% compared to 23.2% in Silt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hazel park at 22.0% compared to 15.5% in Silt.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Silt at 21.2% compared to 17.1% in Hazel park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hazel park at 35.9% compared to 25.8% in Silt.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hazel park at 22.0% compared to 6.0% in Silt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hazel park | Silt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (152) | 2.2% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (3,127) | 11.4% (409) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (2,395) | 17.0% (611) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (2,511) | 11.0% (397) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hazel park vs Silt
- In Silt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 1.0% in Hazel park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazel park hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 11.4% in Silt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Silt at 17.0%, compared to 16.1% in Hazel park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazel park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 11.0% in Silt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.