Demographics details for Hawthorne, FL vs Pulaski, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hawthorne, FL vs Pulaski, WI.
Data | Hawthorne | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,483 | 4,045 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 29.1 years |
Median Income | $49,479 | $65,906 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hawthorne vs Pulaski
- The population in Pulaski is higher at 4,045, compared to 1,483 in Hawthorne.
- Residents in Hawthorne have a higher median age of 38.4 years compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $65,906, compared to $49,479 in Hawthorne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hawthorne at 35.0% compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- Hawthorne has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hawthorne and Pulaski at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hawthorne vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hawthorne | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Black | 71 | 1 |
White | 18 | 84 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hawthorne at 71% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 84% compared to 18% in Hawthorne.
- In Pulaski, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hawthorne.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hawthorne at 3% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pulaski at 10%, compared to 8% in Hawthorne.
- In Pulaski, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hawthorne.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hawthorne | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.4% |
Depression | 19.6% | 22.4% |
Smoking | 22.5% | 14.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 24.7% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 35.4% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Pulaski
- More residents in Hawthorne report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pulaski at 22.4% versus 19.6% in Hawthorne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hawthorne at 22.5% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 14.9% in Hawthorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hawthorne at 36.3% compared to 35.4% in Pulaski.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hawthorne at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hawthorne | Pulaski |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.4% (16) |
High School Diploma | 26.2% (389) | 17.7% (715) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (148) | 4.7% (191) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (181) | 10.7% (432) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hawthorne vs Pulaski
- In Pulaski, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Hawthorne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hawthorne hold a high school diploma at 26.2% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- More residents in Hawthorne have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hawthorne hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 10.7% in Pulaski.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.