Demographics details for Hawthorne, FL vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hawthorne, FL vs Centralia, IL.
Data | Hawthorne | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,483 | 11,931 |
Median Age | 38.4 years | 40.7 years |
Median Income | $49,479 | $46,468 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hawthorne vs Centralia
- The population in Centralia is higher at 11,931, compared to 1,483 in Hawthorne.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 38.4 years in Hawthorne.
- Hawthorne has a higher median income of $49,479 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hawthorne at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- Hawthorne has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Centralia.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Hawthorne.
Demographics
Demographics Hawthorne vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hawthorne | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Black | 71 | 10 |
White | 18 | 79 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hawthorne at 71% compared to 10% in Centralia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to 18% in Hawthorne.
- In Centralia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hawthorne.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Hawthorne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hawthorne at 8% compared to 5% in Centralia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hawthorne and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hawthorne | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.8% |
Depression | 19.6% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 22.5% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 36.3% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Hawthorne.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 19.6% in Hawthorne.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 22.5% in Hawthorne.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Centralia at 16.4% compared to 14.9% in Hawthorne.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 36.3% in Hawthorne.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Hawthorne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hawthorne | Centralia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.6% (72) |
High School Diploma | 26.2% (389) | 18.8% (2,243) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (148) | 13.7% (1,638) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (181) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hawthorne vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Hawthorne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hawthorne hold a high school diploma at 26.2% compared to 18.8% in Centralia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 10.0% in Hawthorne.
- In Centralia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.2% in Hawthorne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.