Demographics details for Hawthorne, CA vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hawthorne, CA vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Hawthorne Spanish fork
Population 84,563 44,102
Median Age 33.3 years 27.4 years
Median Income $72,298 $93,989
Married Families 31.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 14% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.8

Population Comparison: Hawthorne vs Spanish fork

  • In Hawthorne, the population is higher at 84,563, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
  • Residents in Hawthorne have a higher median age of 33.3 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $72,298 in Hawthorne.
  • In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 31.0% in Hawthorne.
  • Hawthorne has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • The unemployment rate in Hawthorne is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Hawthorne vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hawthorne Spanish fork
Black 27 1
White -10 80
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 57 12
Two or More Races 17 7
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Spanish fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hawthorne at 27% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to -10% in Hawthorne.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hawthorne at 7% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hawthorne at 57% compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hawthorne at 17% compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hawthorne at 2% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hawthorne Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 10.8%
Depression 15.5% 23.8%
Smoking 12.7% 7.7%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 8.3%
Obesity 32.9% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hawthorne vs Spanish fork

  • More residents in Hawthorne report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 15.5% in Hawthorne.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hawthorne at 12.7% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hawthorne at 14.1% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hawthorne at 32.9% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hawthorne at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hawthorne Spanish fork
No Schooling 2.6% (2,159) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 14.5% (12,220) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 26.9% (22,712) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (13,868) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Hawthorne vs Spanish fork

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hawthorne have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hawthorne hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents in Hawthorne have less than a high school education at 26.9% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • In Spanish fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 16.4% in Hawthorne.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.