Demographics details for Havelock, NC vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Havelock, NC vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Havelock | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,188 | 142 |
| Median Age | 23.8 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,492 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Havelock vs Griffin
- In Havelock, the population is higher at 16,188, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- The median age in Griffin is higher at 31.7 years, compared to 23.8 years in Havelock.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $56,492 in Havelock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Havelock at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Griffin.
- Havelock has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Griffin.
- The unemployment rate in Havelock is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Griffin.
Demographics
Demographics Havelock vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Havelock | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | Data is updating |
| White | 50 | 98 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Havelock vs Griffin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Havelock at 17% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 50% in Havelock.
- The Asian population is larger in Havelock at 4% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Havelock at 17% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Havelock at 11% compared to 2% in Griffin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Havelock at 1% compared to 0% in Griffin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Havelock | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Havelock vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.7% in Havelock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 22.5% in Havelock.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 17.0% in Havelock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Havelock at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Griffin.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 37.2% in Havelock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Havelock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Havelock | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (53) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 11.8% (1,910) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 4.4% (720) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (1,291) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Havelock vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Havelock.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 11.8% in Havelock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 9.9%, compared to 4.4% in Havelock.
- In Griffin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Havelock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.