Demographics details for Hattiesburg, MS vs Longmont, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hattiesburg, MS vs Longmont, CO.
| Data | Hattiesburg | Longmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,455 | 98,687 |
| Median Age | 28.5 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,024 | $89,720 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Longmont
- The population in Longmont is higher at 98,687, compared to 48,455 in Hattiesburg.
- The median age in Longmont is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 28.5 years in Hattiesburg.
- Longmont has a higher median income of $89,720, compared to $41,024 in Hattiesburg.
- In Longmont, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 23.0% in Hattiesburg.
- Hattiesburg has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 7% in Longmont.
- Longmont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Hattiesburg.
Demographics
Demographics Hattiesburg vs Longmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hattiesburg | Longmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 52 | 1 |
| White | 38 | 62 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Longmont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hattiesburg at 52% compared to 1% in Longmont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Longmont at 62% compared to 38% in Hattiesburg.
- In Longmont, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Hattiesburg.
- Longmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 4% in Hattiesburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Longmont at 10%, compared to 5% in Hattiesburg.
- In Longmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hattiesburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hattiesburg | Longmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 18.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Longmont
- More residents in Hattiesburg report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 15.6% in Longmont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Longmont at 23.1% versus 20.7% in Hattiesburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hattiesburg at 20.8% compared to 12.8% in Longmont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Longmont at 19.6% compared to 12.9% in Hattiesburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hattiesburg at 43.0% compared to 18.4% in Longmont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hattiesburg at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Longmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hattiesburg | Longmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (362) | 1.0% (1,008) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (5,022) | 10.4% (10,238) |
| Less than High School | 7.5% (3,642) | 10.2% (10,020) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (9,782) | 32.3% (31,887) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hattiesburg vs Longmont
- In Longmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Hattiesburg.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 10.4%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Longmont at 10.2%, compared to 7.5% in Hattiesburg.
- In Longmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 20.2% in Hattiesburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.