Demographics details for Haslett, MI vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Haslett, MI vs Taylorsville, UT.
Data | Haslett | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,091 | 57,879 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $72,380 | $81,417 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Haslett vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 19,091 in Haslett.
- Residents in Haslett have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $72,380 in Haslett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Haslett at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Taylorsville.
- The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 7% in Haslett.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Haslett.
Demographics
Demographics Haslett vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Haslett | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 76 | 57 |
Asian | 8 | 7 |
Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Haslett vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Haslett at 3% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Haslett has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Haslett at 8% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Haslett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 8% in Haslett.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Haslett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Haslett | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.4% |
Depression | 24.8% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 10.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Haslett vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.4% in Haslett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 24.8% in Haslett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Haslett at 11.8% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Haslett at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Haslett at 32.3% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Haslett and Taylorsville at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Haslett | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (15) | 1.2% (721) |
High School Diploma | 8.6% (1,648) | 16.9% (9,799) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (641) | 15.2% (8,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (8,036) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Haslett vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Haslett.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 8.6% in Haslett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 3.4% in Haslett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haslett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 15.7% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.