Demographics details for Haslett, MI vs Hopkins, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Haslett, MI vs Hopkins, SC.
| Data | Haslett | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,091 | 1,738 |
| Median Age | 41.0 years | 53.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,380 | $57,262 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Haslett vs Hopkins
- In Haslett, the population is higher at 19,091, compared to 1,738 in Hopkins.
- The median age in Hopkins is higher at 53.9 years, compared to 41.0 years in Haslett.
- Haslett has a higher median income of $72,380 compared to $57,262 in Hopkins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Haslett at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Hopkins.
- Haslett has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Haslett.
Demographics
Demographics Haslett vs Hopkins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Haslett | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 83 |
| White | 76 | 16 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Haslett vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 83% compared to 3% in Haslett.
- Haslett has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 16% in Hopkins.
- The Asian population is larger in Haslett at 8% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Haslett at 5% compared to 0% in Hopkins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Haslett at 8% compared to 1% in Hopkins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Haslett and Hopkins at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Haslett | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Haslett vs Hopkins
- In Hopkins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.4% in Haslett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Haslett at 24.8% compared to 18.8% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 11.8% in Haslett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Haslett at 18.2% compared to 16.0% in Hopkins.
- Hopkins has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 32.3% in Haslett.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hopkins at 34.0% compared to 12.0% in Haslett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Haslett | Hopkins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (15) | 0.1% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 8.6% (1,648) | 20.8% (362) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (641) | 11.3% (197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (8,036) | 16.2% (281) |
Education Levels Comparison: Haslett vs Hopkins
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Haslett and Hopkins at 0.1%.
- In Hopkins, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 8.6% in Haslett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hopkins at 11.3%, compared to 3.4% in Haslett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haslett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 16.2% in Hopkins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.