Demographics details for Harwich, MA vs Camas, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harwich, MA vs Camas, WA.
| Data | Harwich | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,133 | 27,371 |
| Median Age | 54.0 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $75,238 | $133,829 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Harwich vs Camas
- The population in Camas is higher at 27,371, compared to 12,133 in Harwich.
- Residents in Harwich have a higher median age of 54.0 years compared to 40.3 years in Camas.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829, compared to $75,238 in Harwich.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harwich at 60.0% compared to 49.0% in Camas.
- Harwich has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 4% in Camas.
- Camas has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Harwich.
Demographics
Demographics Harwich vs Camas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harwich | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1.1 | 2 |
| White | 93.7 | 73 |
| Asian | 0.9 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 2.7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1.5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 0.1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harwich vs Camas
- In Camas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1.1% in Harwich.
- Harwich has a higher percentage of White residents at 93.7% compared to 73% in Camas.
- In Camas, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0.9% in Harwich.
- Camas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2.7% in Harwich.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Camas at 9%, compared to 1.5% in Harwich.
- In Camas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0.1% in Harwich.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harwich | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 9.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harwich vs Camas
- In Camas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camas at 23.8% versus 0.0% in Harwich.
- Camas has a higher smoking rate at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camas at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- Camas has higher obesity rates at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camas at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harwich | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (110) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.9% (2,708) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.7% (1,021) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 33.5% (9,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harwich vs Camas
- In Camas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- In Camas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camas at 3.7%, compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
- In Camas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Harwich.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.