Demographics details for Harwich port, MA vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harwich port, MA vs Eureka, MO.
Data | Harwich port | Eureka |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,252 | 12,729 |
Median Age | 63.5 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $58,854 | $104,697 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Harwich port vs Eureka
- The population in Eureka is higher at 12,729, compared to 2,252 in Harwich port.
- Residents in Harwich port have a higher median age of 63.5 years compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $58,854 in Harwich port.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Harwich port.
- The poverty level is identical in both Harwich port and Eureka at 5%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Harwich port and Eureka at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Harwich port vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Harwich port | Eureka |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 95 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Harwich port vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harwich port at 1% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Harwich port has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 88% in Eureka.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Harwich port.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Harwich port and Eureka at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 2% in Harwich port.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harwich port and Eureka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Harwich port | Eureka |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.1% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 8.7% |
Depression | 24.2% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 12.4% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 21.9% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 30.0% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harwich port vs Eureka
- More residents in Harwich port report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harwich port at 24.2% compared to 22.8% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 12.4% in Harwich port.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 19.2% in Harwich port.
- Eureka has higher obesity rates at 30.0% compared to 28.6% in Harwich port.
- Disability percentages are higher in Harwich port at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Harwich port | Eureka |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 8.6% (193) | 10.5% (1,337) |
Less than High School | 2.5% (56) | 3.2% (405) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 52.0% (1,171) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harwich port vs Eureka
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Harwich port and Eureka at 0.0%.
- In Eureka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 8.6% in Harwich port.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eureka at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Harwich port.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harwich port hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.0% compared to 30.1% in Eureka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.