Demographics details for Harwich port, MA vs Beaverdam, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harwich port, MA vs Beaverdam, VA.

Data Harwich port Beaverdam
Population 2,252 14,809
Median Age 63.5 years 45.4 years
Median Income $58,854 $110,208
Married Families 38.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.0

Population Comparison: Harwich port vs Beaverdam

  • The population in Beaverdam is higher at 14,809, compared to 2,252 in Harwich port.
  • Residents in Harwich port have a higher median age of 63.5 years compared to 45.4 years in Beaverdam.
  • Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208, compared to $58,854 in Harwich port.
  • In Beaverdam, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 38.0% in Harwich port.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Harwich port and Beaverdam at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in Harwich port is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Beaverdam.

Demographics

Demographics Harwich port vs Beaverdam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harwich port Beaverdam
Black 1 9
White 95 78
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 2 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harwich port vs Beaverdam

  • In Beaverdam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Harwich port.
  • Harwich port has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 78% in Beaverdam.
  • In Beaverdam, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Harwich port.
  • Beaverdam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Harwich port.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverdam at 6%, compared to 2% in Harwich port.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harwich port and Beaverdam at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harwich port Beaverdam
Mental Health Not Good 16.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% Data is updating%
Depression 24.2% Data is updating%
Smoking 12.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.2% Data is updating%
Obesity 28.6% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harwich port vs Beaverdam

  • More residents in Harwich port report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harwich port at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harwich port at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harwich port at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harwich port at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Harwich port at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Beaverdam.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harwich port Beaverdam
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (151)
High School Diploma 8.6% (193) 16.6% (2,455)
Less than High School 2.5% (56) 7.5% (1,117)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 52.0% (1,171) 33.8% (5,006)

Education Levels Comparison: Harwich port vs Beaverdam

  • In Beaverdam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Harwich port.
  • In Beaverdam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 8.6% in Harwich port.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverdam at 7.5%, compared to 2.5% in Harwich port.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harwich port hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.0% compared to 33.8% in Beaverdam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.