Demographics details for Hartshorne, OK vs Pearisburg, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hartshorne, OK vs Pearisburg, VA.
Data | Hartshorne | Pearisburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,918 | 2,832 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 46.5 years |
Median Income | $36,154 | $70,905 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hartshorne vs Pearisburg
- The population in Pearisburg is higher at 2,832, compared to 1,918 in Hartshorne.
- The median age in Pearisburg is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 42.4 years in Hartshorne.
- Pearisburg has a higher median income of $70,905, compared to $36,154 in Hartshorne.
- In Pearisburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 28.0% in Hartshorne.
- Hartshorne has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Pearisburg.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hartshorne and Pearisburg at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hartshorne vs Pearisburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hartshorne | Pearisburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 10 |
White | 62 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 24 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hartshorne vs Pearisburg
- In Pearisburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 2% in Hartshorne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pearisburg at 89% compared to 62% in Hartshorne.
- Both Hartshorne and Pearisburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hartshorne at 3% compared to 1% in Pearisburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hartshorne at 24% compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hartshorne at 9% compared to 0% in Pearisburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hartshorne | Pearisburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 18.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 26.6% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 41.3% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hartshorne vs Pearisburg
- More residents in Hartshorne report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.2% in Pearisburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hartshorne at 26.6% compared to 24.8% in Pearisburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hartshorne at 22.4% compared to 19.5% in Pearisburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pearisburg at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Hartshorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hartshorne at 41.3% compared to 36.0% in Pearisburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hartshorne at 27.0% compared to 14.0% in Pearisburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hartshorne | Pearisburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (25) | 0.7% (20) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (387) | 33.2% (939) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (297) | 7.0% (199) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (227) | 15.0% (426) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hartshorne vs Pearisburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartshorne have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Pearisburg.
- In Pearisburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.2% compared to 20.2% in Hartshorne.
- More residents in Hartshorne have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 7.0% in Pearisburg.
- In Pearisburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 11.8% in Hartshorne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.