Demographics details for Hartshorne, OK vs Cranston, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hartshorne, OK vs Cranston, RI.
| Data | Hartshorne | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,918 | 82,421 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $36,154 | $83,123 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hartshorne vs Cranston
- The population in Cranston is higher at 82,421, compared to 1,918 in Hartshorne.
- Residents in Hartshorne have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123, compared to $36,154 in Hartshorne.
- In Cranston, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 28.0% in Hartshorne.
- Hartshorne has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Hartshorne.
Demographics
Demographics Hartshorne vs Cranston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hartshorne | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 62 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 24 | 9 |
| American Indian | 9 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hartshorne vs Cranston
- In Cranston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Hartshorne.
- Hartshorne has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Hartshorne.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Hartshorne.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hartshorne at 24% compared to 9% in Cranston.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hartshorne at 9% compared to 0% in Cranston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hartshorne | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 41.3% | 29.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hartshorne vs Cranston
- More residents in Hartshorne report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hartshorne at 26.6% compared to 24.9% in Cranston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hartshorne at 22.4% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 15.2% in Hartshorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hartshorne at 41.3% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hartshorne at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hartshorne | Cranston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (25) | 1.1% (930) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (387) | 16.1% (13,246) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (297) | 13.4% (11,048) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (227) | 24.7% (20,330) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hartshorne vs Cranston
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartshorne have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.1% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartshorne hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Hartshorne have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- In Cranston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 11.8% in Hartshorne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.