Demographics details for Hartford, WV vs Klamath falls, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hartford, WV vs Klamath falls, OR.

Data Hartford Klamath falls
Population 498 21,977
Median Age 46.8 years 35.1 years
Median Income $50,114 $46,695
Married Families 47.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 14% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Hartford vs Klamath falls

  • The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 498 in Hartford.
  • Residents in Hartford have a higher median age of 46.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Klamath falls.
  • Hartford has a higher median income of $50,114 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hartford at 47.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 14% in Hartford.
  • Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Hartford.

Demographics

Demographics Hartford vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hartford Klamath falls
Black Data is updating 1
White 98 69
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 15
Two or More Races 2 11
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Hartford vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Hartford.
  • Hartford has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hartford.
  • Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 0% in Hartford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 2% in Hartford.
  • In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Hartford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hartford Klamath falls
Mental Health Not Good 22.5% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 13.4%
Depression 29.9% 28.4%
Smoking 25.6% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 13.8% 15.8%
Obesity 47.1% 35.9%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hartford vs Klamath falls

  • More residents in Hartford report poor mental health at 22.5% compared to 20.2% in Klamath falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hartford at 29.9% compared to 28.4% in Klamath falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hartford at 25.6% compared to 19.9% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Klamath falls at 15.8% compared to 13.8% in Hartford.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hartford at 47.1% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hartford at 24.0% compared to 20.0% in Klamath falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hartford Klamath falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (192)
High School Diploma 30.5% (152) 16.0% (3,508)
Less than High School 38.2% (190) 15.5% (3,401)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.4% (3,175)

Education Levels Comparison: Hartford vs Klamath falls

  • In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hartford hold a high school diploma at 30.5% compared to 16.0% in Klamath falls.
  • More residents in Hartford have less than a high school education at 38.2% compared to 15.5% in Klamath falls.
  • In Klamath falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.