Demographics details for Hartford, NY vs Southaven, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hartford, NY vs Southaven, MS.

Data Hartford Southaven
Population 2,269 56,360
Median Age 42.0 years 35.4 years
Median Income $59,375 $72,513
Married Families 45.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Hartford vs Southaven

  • The population in Southaven is higher at 56,360, compared to 2,269 in Hartford.
  • Residents in Hartford have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 35.4 years in Southaven.
  • Southaven has a higher median income of $72,513, compared to $59,375 in Hartford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hartford at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Southaven.
  • The poverty level is higher in Southaven at 12%, compared to 8% in Hartford.
  • The unemployment rate in Hartford is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Southaven.

Demographics

Demographics Hartford vs Southaven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hartford Southaven
Black Data is updating 35
White 95 55
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 2 5
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hartford vs Southaven

  • In Southaven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 0% in Hartford.
  • Hartford has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 55% in Southaven.
  • Both Hartford and Southaven have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Southaven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Hartford.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Southaven at 4%, compared to 2% in Hartford.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hartford and Southaven at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hartford Southaven
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.9%
Depression Data is updating% 22.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 16.7%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hartford vs Southaven

  • In Southaven, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Southaven at 22.9% versus 0.0% in Hartford.
  • Southaven has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Southaven at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • Southaven has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Southaven at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hartford Southaven
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (658)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.8% (8,925)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.7% (4,879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.0% (9,035)

Education Levels Comparison: Hartford vs Southaven

  • In Southaven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • In Southaven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Southaven at 8.7%, compared to 0.0% in Hartford.
  • In Southaven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Hartford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.