Demographics details for Hartford, CT vs White house, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hartford, CT vs White house, TN.
| Data | Hartford | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 120,686 | 14,516 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $41,841 | $85,404 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Hartford vs White house
- In Hartford, the population is higher at 120,686, compared to 14,516 in White house.
- The median age in White house is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404, compared to $41,841 in Hartford.
- In White house, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in White house.
- The unemployment rate in Hartford is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics Hartford vs White house provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hartford | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 36 | 2 |
| White | 2 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 46 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hartford vs White house
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hartford at 36% compared to 2% in White house.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in White house at 87% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Asian population is larger in Hartford at 2% compared to 1% in White house.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hartford at 46% compared to 4% in White house.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hartford at 13% compared to 6% in White house.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hartford at 1% compared to 0% in White house.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hartford | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hartford vs White house
- More residents in Hartford report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Higher depression rates are seen in White house at 27.6% versus 22.6% in Hartford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hartford at 20.2% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in White house at 16.7% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hartford at 43.3% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hartford at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hartford | White house |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (3,500) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (21,002) | 18.0% (2,617) |
| Less than High School | 27.9% (33,618) | 12.4% (1,794) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (13,316) | 15.4% (2,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hartford vs White house
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartford have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.2% in White house.
- In White house, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.0% compared to 17.4% in Hartford.
- More residents in Hartford have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 12.4% in White house.
- In White house, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 11.0% in Hartford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.