Demographics details for Hartford, CT vs Parsons, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hartford, CT vs Parsons, KS.
Data | Hartford | Parsons |
---|---|---|
Population | 120,686 | 9,382 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 38.0 years |
Median Income | $41,841 | $48,990 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hartford vs Parsons
- In Hartford, the population is higher at 120,686, compared to 9,382 in Parsons.
- The median age in Parsons is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- Parsons has a higher median income of $48,990, compared to $41,841 in Hartford.
- In Parsons, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Parsons.
- The unemployment rate in Hartford is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Parsons.
Demographics
Demographics Hartford vs Parsons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hartford | Parsons |
---|---|---|
Black | 36 | 8 |
White | 2 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hartford vs Parsons
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hartford at 36% compared to 8% in Parsons.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parsons at 79% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Asian population is larger in Hartford at 2% compared to 0% in Parsons.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hartford at 46% compared to 7% in Parsons.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hartford at 13% compared to 6% in Parsons.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hartford at 1% compared to 0% in Parsons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hartford | Parsons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.7% |
Depression | 22.6% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 43.3% | 45.2% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hartford vs Parsons
- More residents in Hartford report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Parsons.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hartford at 22.6% compared to 22.3% in Parsons.
- Parsons has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 20.2% in Hartford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parsons at 17.3% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Parsons has higher obesity rates at 45.2% compared to 43.3% in Hartford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parsons at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Hartford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hartford | Parsons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (3,500) | 1.2% (113) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (21,002) | 15.2% (1,423) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (33,618) | 11.6% (1,093) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (13,316) | 17.3% (1,621) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hartford vs Parsons
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartford have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.2% in Parsons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartford hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Parsons.
- More residents in Hartford have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 11.6% in Parsons.
- In Parsons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 11.0% in Hartford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.