Demographics details for Hartford, CT vs Curwensville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hartford, CT vs Curwensville, PA.
Data | Hartford | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Population | 120,686 | 2,532 |
Median Age | 33.1 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $41,841 | $46,726 |
Married Families | 19.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hartford vs Curwensville
- In Hartford, the population is higher at 120,686, compared to 2,532 in Curwensville.
- The median age in Curwensville is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 33.1 years in Hartford.
- Curwensville has a higher median income of $46,726, compared to $41,841 in Hartford.
- In Curwensville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 19.0% in Hartford.
- Hartford has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Curwensville.
- The unemployment rate in Hartford is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Curwensville.
Demographics
Demographics Hartford vs Curwensville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hartford | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Black | 36 | 1 |
White | 2 | 95 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hartford vs Curwensville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hartford at 36% compared to 1% in Curwensville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Curwensville at 95% compared to 2% in Hartford.
- The Asian population is larger in Hartford at 2% compared to 0% in Curwensville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hartford at 46% compared to 1% in Curwensville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hartford at 13% compared to 3% in Curwensville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hartford at 1% compared to 0% in Curwensville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hartford | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.6% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 43.3% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hartford vs Curwensville
- More residents in Hartford report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Curwensville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Curwensville at 23.9% versus 22.6% in Hartford.
- Curwensville has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 20.2% in Hartford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Curwensville at 18.4% compared to 12.1% in Hartford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hartford at 43.3% compared to 37.1% in Curwensville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Curwensville at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Hartford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hartford | Curwensville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (3,500) | 0.5% (12) |
High School Diploma | 17.4% (21,002) | 28.4% (720) |
Less than High School | 27.9% (33,618) | 10.5% (266) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (13,316) | 17.8% (451) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hartford vs Curwensville
- A higher percentage of residents in Hartford have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.5% in Curwensville.
- In Curwensville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.4% compared to 17.4% in Hartford.
- More residents in Hartford have less than a high school education at 27.9% compared to 10.5% in Curwensville.
- In Curwensville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 11.0% in Hartford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.