Demographics details for Harrisonburg, VA vs South pasadena, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrisonburg, VA vs South pasadena, CA.

Data Harrisonburg South pasadena
Population 51,158 25,850
Median Age 25.4 years 40.6 years
Median Income $56,050 $127,882
Married Families 25.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 18% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Harrisonburg vs South pasadena

  • In Harrisonburg, the population is higher at 51,158, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • The median age in South pasadena is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 25.4 years in Harrisonburg.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882, compared to $56,050 in Harrisonburg.
  • In South pasadena, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 25.0% in Harrisonburg.
  • Harrisonburg has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • South pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Harrisonburg.

Demographics

Demographics Harrisonburg vs South pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrisonburg South pasadena
Black 8 4
White 56 31
Asian 3 34
Hispanic 21 19
Two or More Races 12 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harrisonburg vs South pasadena

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harrisonburg at 8% compared to 4% in South pasadena.
  • Harrisonburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, the Asian population stands at 34%, greater than 3% in Harrisonburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Harrisonburg at 21% compared to 19% in South pasadena.
  • Both Harrisonburg and South pasadena have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 12%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harrisonburg and South pasadena at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrisonburg South pasadena
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 11.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 7.1%
Depression 25.0% 13.8%
Smoking 17.8% 6.3%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 15.3%
Obesity 36.5% 20.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrisonburg vs South pasadena

  • More residents in Harrisonburg report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harrisonburg at 25.0% compared to 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harrisonburg at 17.8% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harrisonburg at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harrisonburg at 36.5% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Harrisonburg at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrisonburg South pasadena
No Schooling 1.5% (768) 0.7% (177)
High School Diploma 11.1% (5,653) 4.3% (1,111)
Less than High School 15.9% (8,118) 3.0% (766)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.1% (9,247) 53.2% (13,751)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrisonburg vs South pasadena

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrisonburg have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrisonburg hold a high school diploma at 11.1% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents in Harrisonburg have less than a high school education at 15.9% compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 18.1% in Harrisonburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.