Demographics details for Harrison, OH vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, OH vs Sacramento, CA.
Data | Harrison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,079 | 528,001 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $99,871 | $78,954 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 13,079 in Harrison.
- Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $99,871 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrison at 46.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 7% in Harrison.
- Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Harrison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 12 |
White | 93 | 26 |
Asian | Data is updating | 19 |
Hispanic | 2 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 0% in Harrison.
- Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 2% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sacramento at 13%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Harrison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 18.4% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Sacramento
- More residents in Harrison report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 23.9% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Harrison at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harrison at 22.8% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 32.7%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacramento at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Harrison | Sacramento |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (62) | 2.7% (14,512) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (2,213) | 11.7% (62,039) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (1,089) | 14.7% (77,760) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (2,637) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacramento at 14.7%, compared to 8.3% in Harrison.
- In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 20.2% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.