Demographics details for Harrison, NJ vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, NJ vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Harrison Sterling heights
Population 19,801 132,567
Median Age 33.7 years 41.2 years
Median Income $72,773 $75,381
Married Families 39.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 11% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Harrison vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 19,801 in Harrison.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Harrison.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $72,773 in Harrison.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in Harrison.
  • Harrison has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.

Demographics

Demographics Harrison vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrison Sterling heights
Black 6 6
White 13 79
Asian 19 9
Hispanic 45 2
Two or More Races 15 4
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Sterling heights

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Harrison and Sterling heights at 6%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 13% in Harrison.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harrison at 19% compared to 9% in Sterling heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Harrison at 45% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Harrison at 15% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harrison at 2% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrison Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 11.4%
Depression 17.5% 25.5%
Smoking 12.7% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 17.7%
Obesity 24.7% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Harrison.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 17.5% in Harrison.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 12.7% in Harrison.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.5% in Harrison.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 24.7% in Harrison.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Harrison.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrison Sterling heights
No Schooling 1.3% (248) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 16.5% (3,268) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 15.6% (3,092) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.4% (6,606) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.3% in Harrison.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 16.5% in Harrison.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 15.6% in Harrison.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.