Demographics details for Harrison, NJ vs Park forest, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, NJ vs Park forest, IL.
| Data | Harrison | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,801 | 20,954 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,773 | $58,907 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 8.9 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Park forest
- The population in Park forest is higher at 20,954, compared to 19,801 in Harrison.
- The median age in Park forest is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 33.7 years in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $72,773 compared to $58,907 in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrison at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Park forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Park forest at 13%, compared to 11% in Harrison.
- Park forest has a higher unemployment rate at 8.9% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Park forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 72 |
| White | 13 | 17 |
| Asian | 19 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Park forest
- In Park forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 72% compared to 6% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Park forest at 17% compared to 13% in Harrison.
- The Asian population is larger in Harrison at 19% compared to 0% in Park forest.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harrison at 45% compared to 7% in Park forest.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Harrison at 15% compared to 3% in Park forest.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harrison at 2% compared to 1% in Park forest.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Park forest
- In Park forest, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Harrison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in Park forest.
- Park forest has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Harrison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Park forest at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Harrison.
- Park forest has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 24.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Park forest at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Park forest |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (248) | 2.4% (503) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (3,268) | 13.4% (2,802) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (3,092) | 8.5% (1,787) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (6,606) | 17.4% (3,650) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Park forest
- In Park forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.3% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 13.4% in Park forest.
- More residents in Harrison have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 8.5% in Park forest.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 17.4% in Park forest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.