Demographics details for Harrison, NJ vs Navajo dam, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, NJ vs Navajo dam, NM.
Data | Harrison | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,801 | 330 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $72,773 | $63,375 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Navajo dam
- In Harrison, the population is higher at 19,801, compared to 330 in Navajo dam.
- The median age in Navajo dam is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $72,773 compared to $63,375 in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrison at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in Navajo dam.
- The poverty level is higher in Navajo dam at 14%, compared to 11% in Harrison.
- The unemployment rate in Harrison is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Navajo dam.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Navajo dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Harrison | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 13 | 16 |
Asian | 19 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 45 | 67 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
American Indian | 2 | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harrison at 6% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Navajo dam at 16% compared to 13% in Harrison.
- The Asian population is larger in Harrison at 19% compared to 0% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 67%, compared to 45% in Harrison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Harrison at 15% compared to 11% in Navajo dam.
- In Navajo dam, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 2% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Harrison | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 11.2% |
Depression | 17.5% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 24.7% | 32.6% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Navajo dam
- In Navajo dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.8% in Harrison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Navajo dam at 17.8% versus 17.5% in Harrison.
- Navajo dam has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Harrison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harrison at 15.5% compared to 14.1% in Navajo dam.
- Navajo dam has higher obesity rates at 32.6% compared to 24.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Navajo dam at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Harrison | Navajo dam |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (248) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.5% (3,268) | 4.8% (16) |
Less than High School | 15.6% (3,092) | 6.1% (20) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (6,606) | 22.7% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Navajo dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 4.8% in Navajo dam.
- More residents in Harrison have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 6.1% in Navajo dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 22.7% in Navajo dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.