Demographics details for Harrison, NJ vs Ash fork, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, NJ vs Ash fork, AZ.
| Data | Harrison | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,801 | 466 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $72,773 | $79,861 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Ash fork
- In Harrison, the population is higher at 19,801, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ash fork is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in Harrison.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861, compared to $72,773 in Harrison.
- In Ash fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 39.0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- The unemployment rate in Harrison is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Ash fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 13 | 79 |
| Asian | 19 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 45 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 15 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harrison at 6% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ash fork at 79% compared to 13% in Harrison.
- The Asian population is larger in Harrison at 19% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harrison at 45% compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- Both Harrison and Ash fork have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 15%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harrison at 2% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 30.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Ash fork
- In Ash fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.8% in Harrison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ash fork at 21.4% versus 17.5% in Harrison.
- Ash fork has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 12.7% in Harrison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 15.5% in Harrison.
- Ash fork has higher obesity rates at 30.6% compared to 24.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 6.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Ash fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (248) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (3,268) | 13.1% (61) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (3,092) | 23.6% (110) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (6,606) | 8.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Ash fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ash fork at 23.6%, compared to 15.6% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.