Demographics details for Harrison, AR vs Woodland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, AR vs Woodland, CA.
| Data | Harrison | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,338 | 61,462 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $39,677 | $84,494 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Woodland
- The population in Woodland is higher at 61,462, compared to 13,338 in Harrison.
- Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher median income of $84,494, compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- In Woodland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 34.0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 92 | 21 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Woodland
- In Woodland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Harrison.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodland at 20%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- In Woodland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Woodland
- More residents in Harrison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.0% in Woodland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 28.9% compared to 18.8% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Harrison at 24.0% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodland at 16.4% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Obesity rates are higher in Harrison at 40.7% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Harrison at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Woodland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (115) | 2.0% (1,223) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,807) | 13.9% (8,533) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (1,665) | 22.2% (13,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (1,751) | 19.0% (11,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 13.9% in Woodland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodland at 22.2%, compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
- In Woodland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.