Demographics details for Harrison, AR vs South cle elum, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, AR vs South cle elum, WA.

Data Harrison South cle elum
Population 13,338 564
Median Age 41.8 years 35.2 years
Median Income $39,677 $56,400
Married Families 34.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Harrison vs South cle elum

  • In Harrison, the population is higher at 13,338, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400, compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
  • In South cle elum, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 34.0% in Harrison.
  • Harrison has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.

Demographics

Demographics Harrison vs South cle elum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrison South cle elum
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 92 84
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 4 6
Two or More Races 4 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs South cle elum

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Harrison and South cle elum at 0%.
  • Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
  • Both Harrison and South cle elum have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South cle elum at 10%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harrison and South cle elum at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrison South cle elum
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.1% 11.9%
Depression 28.9% 26.2%
Smoking 24.0% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 18.3%
Obesity 40.7% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs South cle elum

  • More residents in Harrison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.8% in South cle elum.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 28.9% compared to 26.2% in South cle elum.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harrison at 24.0% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harrison at 40.7% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Harrison.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrison South cle elum
No Schooling 0.9% (115) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.0% (2,807) 22.2% (125)
Less than High School 12.5% (1,665) 21.6% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.1% (1,751) 20.6% (116)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs South cle elum

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • In South cle elum, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 21.0% in Harrison.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South cle elum at 21.6%, compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
  • In South cle elum, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.