Demographics details for Harrison, AR vs Sallisaw, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, AR vs Sallisaw, OK.
| Data | Harrison | Sallisaw |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,338 | 8,540 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,677 | $44,310 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Sallisaw
- In Harrison, the population is higher at 13,338, compared to 8,540 in Sallisaw.
- Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher median income of $44,310, compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Harrison and Sallisaw at 34.0%.
- Harrison has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Sallisaw.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Harrison and Sallisaw at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Sallisaw provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Sallisaw |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 92 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 18 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Sallisaw
- In Sallisaw, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 59% in Sallisaw.
- Both Harrison and Sallisaw have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sallisaw has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sallisaw at 13%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- In Sallisaw, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 18%, compared to 0% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Sallisaw |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 22.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 17.3% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 28.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 44.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Sallisaw
- In Sallisaw, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.7% compared to 20.3% in Harrison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 28.9% compared to 28.5% in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has a higher smoking rate at 28.1% compared to 24.0% in Harrison.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harrison at 14.8% compared to 13.0% in Sallisaw.
- Sallisaw has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 40.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sallisaw at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Sallisaw |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (115) | 1.2% (99) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,807) | 14.8% (1,261) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (1,665) | 19.9% (1,701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (1,751) | 10.4% (884) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Sallisaw
- In Sallisaw, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 14.8% in Sallisaw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sallisaw at 19.9%, compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 10.4% in Sallisaw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.