Demographics details for Harrison, AR vs Freeland, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, AR vs Freeland, MI.
| Data | Harrison | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,338 | 7,357 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $39,677 | $95,478 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Freeland
- In Harrison, the population is higher at 13,338, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478, compared to $39,677 in Harrison.
- In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 4% in Freeland.
- The unemployment rate in Harrison is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 92 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Freeland
- In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 76% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Harrison.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Freeland at 8%, compared to 4% in Harrison.
- In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 14.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Freeland
- More residents in Harrison report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 28.9% compared to 20.4% in Freeland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Harrison at 24.0% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Obesity rates are higher in Harrison at 40.7% compared to 37.8% in Freeland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Harrison at 18.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Freeland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (115) | 0.7% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,807) | 13.8% (1,014) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (1,665) | 7.4% (542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (1,751) | 21.8% (1,605) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Freeland
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 21.0% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- More residents in Harrison have less than a high school education at 12.5% compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 13.1% in Harrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.