Demographics details for Harrison, AR vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, AR vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Harrison | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,338 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $39,677 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Cambridge
- In Harrison, the population is higher at 13,338, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- Residents in Harrison have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.1 years in Cambridge.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $39,677 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrison at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 15% in Harrison.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Harrison and Cambridge at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 92 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 88% in Cambridge.
- Both Harrison and Cambridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harrison at 4% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- Both Harrison and Cambridge have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harrison and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 20.3% in Harrison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrison at 28.9% compared to 25.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 24.0% in Harrison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cambridge at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Harrison.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 40.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (115) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 21.0% (2,807) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (1,665) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.1% (1,751) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Cambridge.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 21.0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 12.5% in Harrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.