Demographics details for Harrisburg, IL vs Gardena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrisburg, IL vs Gardena, CA.
| Data | Harrisburg | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,982 | 58,843 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,937 | $75,443 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Harrisburg vs Gardena
- The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 7,982 in Harrisburg.
- The median age in Gardena is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 36.6 years in Harrisburg.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443, compared to $38,937 in Harrisburg.
- In Gardena, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in Harrisburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Harrisburg and Gardena at 15%.
- Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.2% in Harrisburg.
Demographics
Demographics Harrisburg vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrisburg | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 20 |
| White | 90 | -5 |
| Asian | 1 | 25 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harrisburg vs Gardena
- In Gardena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Harrisburg.
- Harrisburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 1% in Harrisburg.
- Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 1% in Harrisburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 6% in Harrisburg.
- In Gardena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrisburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrisburg | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 13.8% |
| Smoking | 22.6% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrisburg vs Gardena
- More residents in Harrisburg report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Harrisburg at 24.6% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Harrisburg at 22.6% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harrisburg at 16.3% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Harrisburg at 40.5% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Harrisburg at 28.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrisburg | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (140) | 3.0% (1,776) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,152) | 15.0% (8,829) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (1,638) | 26.5% (15,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,163) | 19.8% (11,669) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrisburg vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.8% in Harrisburg.
- In Gardena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 14.4% in Harrisburg.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 20.5% in Harrisburg.
- In Gardena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 14.6% in Harrisburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.