Demographics details for Harrington park, NJ vs San marcos, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrington park, NJ vs San marcos, CA.

Data Harrington park San marcos
Population 4,954 94,854
Median Age 46.9 years 35.9 years
Median Income $183,138 $99,413
Married Families 57.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.7

Population Comparison: Harrington park vs San marcos

  • The population in San marcos is higher at 94,854, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • Residents in Harrington park have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 35.9 years in San marcos.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138 compared to $99,413 in San marcos.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrington park at 57.0% compared to 41.0% in San marcos.
  • The poverty level is higher in San marcos at 9%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • San marcos has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Harrington park vs San marcos provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrington park San marcos
Black Data is updating 2
White 70 31
Asian 19 10
Hispanic 5 40
Two or More Races 6 16
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Harrington park vs San marcos

  • In San marcos, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 31% in San marcos.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harrington park at 19% compared to 10% in San marcos.
  • San marcos has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 5% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San marcos at 16%, compared to 6% in Harrington park.
  • In San marcos, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrington park San marcos
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.0% 10.8%
Depression 16.7% 17.8%
Smoking 9.6% 11.2%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.6%
Obesity 23.0% 24.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrington park vs San marcos

  • In San marcos, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in San marcos at 17.8% versus 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • San marcos has a higher smoking rate at 11.2% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in San marcos at 18.6% compared to 17.5% in Harrington park.
  • San marcos has higher obesity rates at 24.2% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Harrington park at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in San marcos.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrington park San marcos
No Schooling 0.2% (10) 1.8% (1,684)
High School Diploma 7.0% (345) 10.1% (9,567)
Less than High School 2.1% (105) 15.0% (14,213)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.3% (2,342) 26.4% (25,049)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrington park vs San marcos

  • In San marcos, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • In San marcos, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.1% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San marcos at 15.0%, compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrington park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 26.4% in San marcos.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.