Demographics details for Harrington park, NJ vs Jay, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrington park, NJ vs Jay, OK.

Data Harrington park Jay
Population 4,954 2,452
Median Age 46.9 years 35.4 years
Median Income $183,138 $36,625
Married Families 57.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.2

Population Comparison: Harrington park vs Jay

  • In Harrington park, the population is higher at 4,954, compared to 2,452 in Jay.
  • Residents in Harrington park have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Jay.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138 compared to $36,625 in Jay.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrington park at 57.0% compared to 39.0% in Jay.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jay at 14%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • The unemployment rate in Harrington park is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Jay.

Demographics

Demographics Harrington park vs Jay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrington park Jay
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 70 26
Asian 19 1
Hispanic 5 8
Two or More Races 6 23
American Indian Data is updating 42

Demographics Comparison: Harrington park vs Jay

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Harrington park and Jay at 0%.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 26% in Jay.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harrington park at 19% compared to 1% in Jay.
  • Jay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jay at 23%, compared to 6% in Harrington park.
  • In Jay, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 42%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrington park Jay
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 22.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.0% 17.1%
Depression 16.7% 26.7%
Smoking 9.6% 28.9%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 14.0%
Obesity 23.0% 43.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrington park vs Jay

  • In Jay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Jay at 26.7% versus 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Jay has a higher smoking rate at 28.9% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harrington park at 17.5% compared to 14.0% in Jay.
  • Jay has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jay at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrington park Jay
No Schooling 0.2% (10) 3.1% (76)
High School Diploma 7.0% (345) 23.5% (577)
Less than High School 2.1% (105) 27.9% (685)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.3% (2,342) 7.6% (186)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrington park vs Jay

  • In Jay, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • In Jay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jay at 27.9%, compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrington park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 7.6% in Jay.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.