Demographics details for Harrington park, NJ vs Canton, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrington park, NJ vs Canton, MS.

Data Harrington park Canton
Population 4,954 10,744
Median Age 46.9 years 35.6 years
Median Income $183,138 $33,411
Married Families 57.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 19%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 5.2

Population Comparison: Harrington park vs Canton

  • The population in Canton is higher at 10,744, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • Residents in Harrington park have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 35.6 years in Canton.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138 compared to $33,411 in Canton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrington park at 57.0% compared to 20.0% in Canton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Canton at 19%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Canton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Harrington park vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrington park Canton
Black Data is updating 76
White 70 16
Asian 19 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 7
Two or More Races 6 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harrington park vs Canton

  • In Canton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 76% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 16% in Canton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harrington park at 19% compared to 0% in Canton.
  • Canton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 5% in Harrington park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Harrington park at 6% compared to 1% in Canton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harrington park and Canton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrington park Canton
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 7.0% 14.3%
Depression 16.7% 18.8%
Smoking 9.6% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 12.6%
Obesity 23.0% 45.8%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrington park vs Canton

  • In Canton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Canton at 18.8% versus 16.7% in Harrington park.
  • Canton has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harrington park at 17.5% compared to 12.6% in Canton.
  • Canton has higher obesity rates at 45.8% compared to 23.0% in Harrington park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Canton at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Harrington park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrington park Canton
No Schooling 0.2% (10) 1.0% (103)
High School Diploma 7.0% (345) 17.6% (1,891)
Less than High School 2.1% (105) 17.2% (1,853)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.3% (2,342) 14.8% (1,587)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrington park vs Canton

  • In Canton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • In Canton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Canton at 17.2%, compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrington park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 14.8% in Canton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.