Demographics details for Harrington park, NJ vs Alhambra, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harrington park, NJ vs Alhambra, CA.

Data Harrington park Alhambra
Population 4,954 80,259
Median Age 46.9 years 41.1 years
Median Income $183,138 $80,234
Married Families 57.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.9

Population Comparison: Harrington park vs Alhambra

  • The population in Alhambra is higher at 80,259, compared to 4,954 in Harrington park.
  • Residents in Harrington park have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 41.1 years in Alhambra.
  • Harrington park has a higher median income of $183,138 compared to $80,234 in Alhambra.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrington park at 57.0% compared to 42.0% in Alhambra.
  • The poverty level is higher in Alhambra at 13%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Alhambra has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.4% in Harrington park.

Demographics

Demographics Harrington park vs Alhambra provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harrington park Alhambra
Black Data is updating 3
White 70 -2
Asian 19 53
Hispanic 5 36
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Harrington park vs Alhambra

  • In Alhambra, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Harrington park.
  • Harrington park has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to -2% in Alhambra.
  • In Alhambra, the Asian population stands at 53%, greater than 19% in Harrington park.
  • Alhambra has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 5% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alhambra at 9%, compared to 6% in Harrington park.
  • In Alhambra, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harrington park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harrington park Alhambra
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 7.0% 9.6%
Depression 16.7% 12.2%
Smoking 9.6% 9.7%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 11.9%
Obesity 23.0% 21.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harrington park vs Alhambra

  • In Alhambra, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 12.5% in Harrington park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harrington park at 16.7% compared to 12.2% in Alhambra.
  • Alhambra has a higher smoking rate at 9.7% compared to 9.6% in Harrington park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harrington park at 17.5% compared to 11.9% in Alhambra.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harrington park at 23.0% compared to 21.7% in Alhambra.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Harrington park and Alhambra at 10.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harrington park Alhambra
No Schooling 0.2% (10) 4.2% (3,333)
High School Diploma 7.0% (345) 15.0% (12,003)
Less than High School 2.1% (105) 17.1% (13,697)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.3% (2,342) 29.7% (23,804)

Education Levels Comparison: Harrington park vs Alhambra

  • In Alhambra, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.2% in Harrington park.
  • In Alhambra, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Harrington park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alhambra at 17.1%, compared to 2.1% in Harrington park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harrington park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.3% compared to 29.7% in Alhambra.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.