Demographics details for Harlingen, TX vs Clarksdale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harlingen, TX vs Clarksdale, MS.
| Data | Harlingen | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 71,678 | 13,969 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $50,367 | $35,377 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 6.9 |
Population Comparison: Harlingen vs Clarksdale
- In Harlingen, the population is higher at 71,678, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age in Clarksdale is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 33.2 years in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has a higher median income of $50,367 compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harlingen at 32.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksdale at 27%, compared to 18% in Harlingen.
- Clarksdale has a higher unemployment rate at 6.9% compared to 5.9% in Harlingen.
Demographics
Demographics Harlingen vs Clarksdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harlingen | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 86 |
| White | -5 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 83 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 19 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Harlingen vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 2% in Harlingen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarksdale at 9% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- The Asian population is larger in Harlingen at 1% compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harlingen at 83% compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Harlingen at 19% compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harlingen and Clarksdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harlingen | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 25.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 11.1% |
| Obesity | 44.2% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harlingen vs Clarksdale
- In Clarksdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.9% in Harlingen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksdale at 20.8% versus 20.1% in Harlingen.
- Clarksdale has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 16.7% in Harlingen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harlingen at 16.3% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 44.2% in Harlingen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Harlingen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harlingen | Clarksdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (1,536) | 2.0% (274) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (9,737) | 9.2% (1,281) |
| Less than High School | 26.2% (18,783) | 15.2% (2,130) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (9,208) | 14.1% (1,964) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harlingen vs Clarksdale
- A higher percentage of residents in Harlingen have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 2.0% in Clarksdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harlingen hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in Harlingen have less than a high school education at 26.2% compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
- In Clarksdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.