Demographics details for Harker heights, TX vs Rockingham, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harker heights, TX vs Rockingham, NC.

Data Harker heights Rockingham
Population 34,102 91,957
Median Age 34.5 years 45.1 years
Median Income $72,258 $50,737
Married Families 35.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 9% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Harker heights vs Rockingham

  • The population in Rockingham is higher at 91,957, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
  • The median age in Rockingham is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258 compared to $50,737 in Rockingham.
  • In Rockingham, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rockingham at 13%, compared to 9% in Harker heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Harker heights is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Rockingham.

Demographics

Demographics Harker heights vs Rockingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harker heights Rockingham
Black 28 17
White 36 70
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 21 6
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Harker heights vs Rockingham

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harker heights at 28% compared to 17% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rockingham at 70% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harker heights at 3% compared to 1% in Rockingham.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Harker heights at 21% compared to 6% in Rockingham.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Harker heights at 11% compared to 5% in Rockingham.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harker heights and Rockingham at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harker heights Rockingham
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.6%
Depression 22.5% 24.9%
Smoking 15.5% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.8%
Obesity 37.1% 39.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harker heights vs Rockingham

  • In Rockingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Rockingham at 24.9% versus 22.5% in Harker heights.
  • Rockingham has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Rockingham.
  • Rockingham has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 37.1% in Harker heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockingham at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harker heights Rockingham
No Schooling 1.3% (448) 0.8% (738)
High School Diploma 11.6% (3,958) 19.9% (18,325)
Less than High School 10.3% (3,509) 20.9% (19,256)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (6,403) 11.1% (10,198)

Education Levels Comparison: Harker heights vs Rockingham

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in Rockingham.
  • In Rockingham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.9% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rockingham at 20.9%, compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 11.1% in Rockingham.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.