Demographics details for Harker heights, TX vs New cuyama, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harker heights, TX vs New cuyama, CA.

Data Harker heights New cuyama
Population 34,102 669
Median Age 34.5 years 41.3 years
Median Income $72,258 $55,104
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Harker heights vs New cuyama

  • In Harker heights, the population is higher at 34,102, compared to 669 in New cuyama.
  • The median age in New cuyama is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258 compared to $55,104 in New cuyama.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Harker heights at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in New cuyama.
  • The poverty level is higher in New cuyama at 15%, compared to 9% in Harker heights.
  • New cuyama has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Harker heights.

Demographics

Demographics Harker heights vs New cuyama provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harker heights New cuyama
Black 28 Data is updating
White 36 29
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 21 52
Two or More Races 11 18
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Harker heights vs New cuyama

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harker heights at 28% compared to 0% in New cuyama.
  • Harker heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 36% compared to 29% in New cuyama.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harker heights at 3% compared to 0% in New cuyama.
  • New cuyama has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 21% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New cuyama at 18%, compared to 11% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Harker heights and New cuyama at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harker heights New cuyama
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 12.4%
Depression 22.5% 20.7%
Smoking 15.5% 14.3%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.5%
Obesity 37.1% 31.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harker heights vs New cuyama

  • In New cuyama, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harker heights at 22.5% compared to 20.7% in New cuyama.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harker heights at 15.5% compared to 14.3% in New cuyama.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 16.5% in New cuyama.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harker heights at 37.1% compared to 31.4% in New cuyama.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Harker heights and New cuyama at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harker heights New cuyama
No Schooling 1.3% (448) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.6% (3,958) 20.2% (135)
Less than High School 10.3% (3,509) 17.3% (116)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (6,403) 16.9% (113)

Education Levels Comparison: Harker heights vs New cuyama

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in New cuyama.
  • In New cuyama, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New cuyama at 17.3%, compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 16.9% in New cuyama.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.