Demographics details for Harker heights, TX vs Mount juliet, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harker heights, TX vs Mount juliet, TN.

Data Harker heights Mount juliet
Population 34,102 42,548
Median Age 34.5 years 39.2 years
Median Income $72,258 $108,066
Married Families 35.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 2.8

Population Comparison: Harker heights vs Mount juliet

  • The population in Mount juliet is higher at 42,548, compared to 34,102 in Harker heights.
  • The median age in Mount juliet is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
  • Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066, compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
  • In Mount juliet, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
  • The unemployment rate in Harker heights is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.

Demographics

Demographics Harker heights vs Mount juliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harker heights Mount juliet
Black 28 7
White 36 79
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 21 6
Two or More Races 11 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harker heights vs Mount juliet

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harker heights at 28% compared to 7% in Mount juliet.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount juliet at 79% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • In Mount juliet, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Harker heights.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Harker heights at 21% compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Harker heights at 11% compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harker heights at 1% compared to 0% in Mount juliet.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harker heights Mount juliet
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.0%
Depression 22.5% 25.7%
Smoking 15.5% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.8%
Obesity 37.1% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harker heights vs Mount juliet

  • More residents in Harker heights report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mount juliet at 25.7% versus 22.5% in Harker heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harker heights at 15.5% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harker heights at 37.1% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harker heights Mount juliet
No Schooling 1.3% (448) 0.4% (173)
High School Diploma 11.6% (3,958) 10.4% (4,408)
Less than High School 10.3% (3,509) 3.9% (1,653)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (6,403) 29.4% (12,510)

Education Levels Comparison: Harker heights vs Mount juliet

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights hold a high school diploma at 11.6% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
  • More residents in Harker heights have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
  • In Mount juliet, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.