Demographics details for Harker heights, TX vs Grove, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harker heights, TX vs Grove, OK.
| Data | Harker heights | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,102 | 7,215 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 46.9 years |
| Median Income | $72,258 | $56,469 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Harker heights vs Grove
- In Harker heights, the population is higher at 34,102, compared to 7,215 in Grove.
- The median age in Grove is higher at 46.9 years, compared to 34.5 years in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258 compared to $56,469 in Grove.
- In Grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
- The poverty level is higher in Grove at 11%, compared to 9% in Harker heights.
- The unemployment rate in Harker heights is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Grove.
Demographics
Demographics Harker heights vs Grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harker heights | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 1 |
| White | 36 | 70 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Harker heights vs Grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harker heights at 28% compared to 1% in Grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grove at 70% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
- The Asian population is larger in Harker heights at 3% compared to 0% in Grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harker heights at 21% compared to 7% in Grove.
- Both Harker heights and Grove have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- In Grove, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 1% in Harker heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harker heights | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harker heights vs Grove
- In Grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.5% in Harker heights.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grove at 25.4% versus 22.5% in Harker heights.
- Grove has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harker heights at 17.1% compared to 15.1% in Grove.
- Grove has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 37.1% in Harker heights.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grove at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harker heights | Grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (448) | 0.3% (20) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (3,958) | 14.8% (1,068) |
| Less than High School | 10.3% (3,509) | 11.5% (832) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (6,403) | 20.3% (1,463) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harker heights vs Grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Grove.
- In Grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grove at 11.5%, compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
- In Grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 18.8% in Harker heights.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.