Demographics details for Harbinger, NC vs Scottsdale, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harbinger, NC vs Scottsdale, AZ.

Data Harbinger Scottsdale
Population 1,070 243,050
Median Age 45.0 years 48.4 years
Median Income $70,000 $104,197
Married Families 0.58% 44.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 0.04 2.9

Population Comparison: Harbinger vs Scottsdale

  • The population in Scottsdale is higher at 243,050, compared to 1,070 in Harbinger.
  • The median age in Scottsdale is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 45.0 years in Harbinger.
  • Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197, compared to $70,000 in Harbinger.
  • In Scottsdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 0.58% in Harbinger.
  • The poverty level is higher in Scottsdale at 9%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.
  • Scottsdale has a higher unemployment rate at 2.9% compared to 0.04% in Harbinger.

Demographics

Demographics Harbinger vs Scottsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harbinger Scottsdale
Black 15 2
White 75 75
Asian 5 5
Hispanic 5 10
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Harbinger vs Scottsdale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harbinger at 15% compared to 2% in Scottsdale.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Harbinger and Scottsdale at 75%.
  • Both Harbinger and Scottsdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
  • Scottsdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Harbinger.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scottsdale at 7%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.
  • In Scottsdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harbinger Scottsdale
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.0%
Depression Data is updating% 19.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 10.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 26.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harbinger vs Scottsdale

  • In Scottsdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Scottsdale at 19.1% versus 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Scottsdale has a higher smoking rate at 10.2% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Scottsdale at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Scottsdale has higher obesity rates at 26.5% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scottsdale at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harbinger Scottsdale
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (1,157)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.7% (18,770)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.0% (9,724)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 47.7% (116,035)

Education Levels Comparison: Harbinger vs Scottsdale

  • In Scottsdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • In Scottsdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Scottsdale at 4.0%, compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • In Scottsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.