Demographics details for Harbinger, NC vs Cherokee, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harbinger, NC vs Cherokee, OK.

Data Harbinger Cherokee
Population 1,070 48,098
Median Age 45.0 years 36.5 years
Median Income $70,000 $52,410
Married Families 0.58% 38.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 0.04 4.6

Population Comparison: Harbinger vs Cherokee

  • The population in Cherokee is higher at 48,098, compared to 1,070 in Harbinger.
  • Residents in Harbinger have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 36.5 years in Cherokee.
  • Harbinger has a higher median income of $70,000 compared to $52,410 in Cherokee.
  • In Cherokee, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 0.58% in Harbinger.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.
  • Cherokee has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 0.04% in Harbinger.

Demographics

Demographics Harbinger vs Cherokee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harbinger Cherokee
Black 15 1
White 75 42
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 5 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 33

Demographics Comparison: Harbinger vs Cherokee

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harbinger at 15% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
  • Harbinger has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 42% in Cherokee.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harbinger at 5% compared to 1% in Cherokee.
  • Cherokee has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 5% in Harbinger.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cherokee at 15%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.
  • In Cherokee, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 33%, compared to 0% in Harbinger.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harbinger Cherokee
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 14.6%
Depression Data is updating% 26.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 43.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harbinger vs Cherokee

  • In Cherokee, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cherokee at 26.6% versus 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Cherokee has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cherokee at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • Cherokee has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cherokee at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harbinger Cherokee
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (433)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.6% (7,526)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.5% (5,552)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.9% (8,612)

Education Levels Comparison: Harbinger vs Cherokee

  • In Cherokee, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • In Cherokee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cherokee at 11.5%, compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.
  • In Cherokee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Harbinger.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.