Demographics details for Hanover, MI vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover, MI vs Warner robins, GA.
| Data | Hanover | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 82,175 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,250 | $63,678 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Hanover vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- Residents in Hanover have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $65,250 compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 31.0% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 40 |
| White | 89 | 42 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 42% in Warner robins.
- In Warner robins, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Hanover.
- Warner robins has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Warner robins at 7%, compared to 5% in Hanover.
- In Warner robins, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hanover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover vs Warner robins
- More residents in Hanover report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Warner robins.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hanover at 25.8% compared to 22.1% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 18.5% in Hanover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 15.9% in Warner robins.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 34.2% in Hanover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hanover at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Warner robins.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover | Warner robins |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.4% (335) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (140) | 14.9% (12,260) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (13) | 7.0% (5,714) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover vs Warner robins
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Hanover and Warner robins at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Warner robins at 7.0%, compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- In Warner robins, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.