Demographics details for Hanover, MI vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover, MI vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Hanover | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,250 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hanover vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- Residents in Hanover have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $65,250 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 10% in Hanover.
- Stillwater has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Hanover.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 89 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Hanover.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 5% in Hanover.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Hanover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.7% in Hanover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 25.8% in Hanover.
- Stillwater has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 18.5% in Hanover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 34.2% in Hanover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hanover at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (140) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (13) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stillwater at 3.9%, compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.