Demographics details for Hanover, MI vs La junta, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover, MI vs La junta, CO.
Data | Hanover | La junta |
---|---|---|
Population | 474 | 7,152 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $65,250 | $50,799 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanover vs La junta
- The population in La junta is higher at 7,152, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- The median age in La junta is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 37.0 years in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher median income of $65,250 compared to $50,799 in La junta.
- In La junta, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Hanover.
- The poverty level is higher in La junta at 15%, compared to 10% in Hanover.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hanover and La junta at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover vs La junta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hanover | La junta |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 89 | 38 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 46 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover vs La junta
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hanover at 3% compared to 1% in La junta.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 38% in La junta.
- In La junta, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hanover.
- La junta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La junta at 11%, compared to 5% in Hanover.
- In La junta, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Hanover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hanover | La junta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.3% |
Depression | 25.8% | 22.5% |
Smoking | 18.5% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover vs La junta
- More residents in Hanover report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.3% in La junta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hanover at 25.8% compared to 22.5% in La junta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hanover at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in La junta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 17.2% in La junta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hanover at 34.2% compared to 32.5% in La junta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in La junta at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Hanover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hanover | La junta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.3% (21) |
High School Diploma | 29.5% (140) | 18.6% (1,328) |
Less than High School | 2.7% (13) | 21.9% (1,569) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 13.2% (944) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover vs La junta
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in La junta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 18.6% in La junta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La junta at 21.9%, compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- In La junta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.