Demographics details for Hanover, MI vs Grayson, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover, MI vs Grayson, GA.
| Data | Hanover | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 4,753 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $65,250 | $121,421 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanover vs Grayson
- The population in Grayson is higher at 4,753, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- Residents in Hanover have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 31.2 years in Grayson.
- Grayson has a higher median income of $121,421, compared to $65,250 in Hanover.
- In Grayson, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Grayson.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hanover and Grayson at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover vs Grayson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 74 |
| White | 89 | 20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover vs Grayson
- In Grayson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 20% in Grayson.
- In Grayson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hanover.
- Grayson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Hanover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover at 5% compared to 1% in Grayson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hanover and Grayson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover vs Grayson
- More residents in Hanover report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 13.3% in Grayson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hanover at 25.8% compared to 17.5% in Grayson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hanover at 18.5% compared to 11.3% in Grayson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Grayson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hanover at 34.2% compared to 28.5% in Grayson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hanover at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Grayson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover | Grayson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (140) | 14.8% (703) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (13) | 6.4% (302) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 24.7% (1,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover vs Grayson
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Grayson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 14.8% in Grayson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grayson at 6.4%, compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- In Grayson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.