Demographics details for Hanover, MI vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover, MI vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Hanover | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $65,250 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanover vs Chino hills
- The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 474 in Hanover.
- The median age in Chino hills is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Hanover.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $65,250 in Hanover.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 31.0% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Hanover and Chino hills at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 89 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 40 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Hanover.
- Hanover has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 0% in Hanover.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 3% in Hanover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 5% in Hanover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hanover and Chino hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover vs Chino hills
- More residents in Hanover report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hanover at 25.8% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hanover at 18.5% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hanover at 34.2% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hanover at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (2) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 29.5% (140) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (13) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Hanover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover hold a high school diploma at 29.5% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chino hills at 7.2%, compared to 2.7% in Hanover.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 6.1% in Hanover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.