Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs Stonington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs Stonington, CT.

Data Hanover park Stonington
Population 36,376 18,545
Median Age 34.7 years 42.0 years
Median Income $88,460 $92,222
Married Families 39.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 2.2

Population Comparison: Hanover park vs Stonington

  • In Hanover park, the population is higher at 36,376, compared to 18,545 in Stonington.
  • The median age in Stonington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
  • Stonington has a higher median income of $92,222, compared to $88,460 in Hanover park.
  • In Stonington, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 39.0% in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Stonington.
  • The unemployment rate in Hanover park is higher at 5.6%, compared to 2.2% in Stonington.

Demographics

Demographics Hanover park vs Stonington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hanover park Stonington
Black 8 2
White 17 90
Asian 20 2
Hispanic 39 4
Two or More Races 15 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs Stonington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hanover park at 8% compared to 2% in Stonington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stonington at 90% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 2% in Stonington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 4% in Stonington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover park at 15% compared to 2% in Stonington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hanover park at 1% compared to 0% in Stonington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hanover park Stonington
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% Data is updating%
Depression 16.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 13.1% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.4% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.5% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 8.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs Stonington

  • More residents in Hanover park report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hanover park at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hanover park at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hanover park at 30.5% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hanover park at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hanover park Stonington
No Schooling 2.1% (758) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.2% (5,894) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 21.1% (7,688) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.0% (6,537) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs Stonington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • More residents in Hanover park have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.