Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs River rouge, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs River rouge, MI.

Data Hanover park River rouge
Population 36,376 7,040
Median Age 34.7 years 34.9 years
Median Income $88,460 $26,343
Married Families 39.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 6% 32%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 12.3

Population Comparison: Hanover park vs River rouge

  • In Hanover park, the population is higher at 36,376, compared to 7,040 in River rouge.
  • The median age in River rouge is higher at 34.9 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460 compared to $26,343 in River rouge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover park at 39.0% compared to 21.0% in River rouge.
  • The poverty level is higher in River rouge at 32%, compared to 6% in Hanover park.
  • River rouge has a higher unemployment rate at 12.3% compared to 5.6% in Hanover park.

Demographics

Demographics Hanover park vs River rouge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hanover park River rouge
Black 8 47
White 17 21
Asian 20 Data is updating
Hispanic 39 16
Two or More Races 15 16
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs River rouge

  • In River rouge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in River rouge at 21% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 0% in River rouge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 16% in River rouge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in River rouge at 16%, compared to 15% in Hanover park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hanover park at 1% compared to 0% in River rouge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hanover park River rouge
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 22.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 18.3%
Depression 16.1% 25.0%
Smoking 13.1% 32.8%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 13.9%
Obesity 30.5% 44.1%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs River rouge

  • In River rouge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.4% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in River rouge at 25.0% versus 16.1% in Hanover park.
  • River rouge has a higher smoking rate at 32.8% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 13.9% in River rouge.
  • River rouge has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in River rouge at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hanover park River rouge
No Schooling 2.1% (758) 2.4% (167)
High School Diploma 16.2% (5,894) 23.7% (1,667)
Less than High School 21.1% (7,688) 21.2% (1,491)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.0% (6,537) 5.5% (389)

Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs River rouge

  • In River rouge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.1% in Hanover park.
  • In River rouge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 16.2% in Hanover park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in River rouge at 21.2%, compared to 21.1% in Hanover park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 5.5% in River rouge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.