Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs Middletown, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs Middletown, OH.
Data | Hanover park | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Population | 36,376 | 51,229 |
Median Age | 34.7 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $88,460 | $50,457 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Hanover park vs Middletown
- The population in Middletown is higher at 51,229, compared to 36,376 in Hanover park.
- The median age in Middletown is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460 compared to $50,457 in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover park at 39.0% compared to 30.0% in Middletown.
- The poverty level is higher in Middletown at 9%, compared to 6% in Hanover park.
- Middletown has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.6% in Hanover park.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover park vs Middletown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hanover park | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 12 |
White | 17 | 76 |
Asian | 20 | 1 |
Hispanic | 39 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs Middletown
- In Middletown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middletown at 76% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
- The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 1% in Middletown.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 4% in Middletown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover park at 15% compared to 7% in Middletown.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hanover park at 1% compared to 0% in Middletown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hanover park | Middletown |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 19.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 14.6% |
Depression | 16.1% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 13.1% | 25.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 30.5% | 48.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs Middletown
- In Middletown, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middletown at 24.9% versus 16.1% in Hanover park.
- Middletown has a higher smoking rate at 25.5% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Middletown at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Hanover park.
- Middletown has higher obesity rates at 48.6% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middletown at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hanover park | Middletown |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (758) | 0.7% (335) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (5,894) | 22.3% (11,448) |
Less than High School | 21.1% (7,688) | 18.6% (9,535) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (6,537) | 10.8% (5,528) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs Middletown
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Middletown.
- In Middletown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 16.2% in Hanover park.
- More residents in Hanover park have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 18.6% in Middletown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 10.8% in Middletown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.