Demographics details for Hanover park, IL vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hanover park, IL vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Hanover park | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 36,376 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 34.7 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,460 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Hanover park vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 36,376 in Hanover park.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hanover park at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 6% in Hanover park.
- The unemployment rate in Hanover park is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Hanover park vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hanover park | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 15 |
| White | 17 | 67 |
| Asian | 20 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hanover park vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
- The Asian population is larger in Hanover park at 20% compared to 2% in Gallatin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hanover park at 39% compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hanover park at 15% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hanover park at 1% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hanover park | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 16.1% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 30.5% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hanover park vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 16.1% in Hanover park.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 13.1% in Hanover park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 30.5% in Hanover park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hanover park | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (758) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (5,894) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 21.1% (7,688) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.0% (6,537) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hanover park vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hanover park hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Hanover park have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 18.0% in Hanover park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.